Skip to content

Study on Strategies to Decrease Firearm-Related Injuries and Deaths

Discussion with NPR's Rachel Martin featuring Garen Wintemute, head of UC Davis' Violence Prevention Research Program, delves into changes in public conduct following mass shootings.

Exploring Studies for Reducing Firearm-Related Harm
Exploring Studies for Reducing Firearm-Related Harm

In the wake of the recent mass shootings in Dayton, Ohio, the focus on gun control has intensified. President Donald Trump has maintained that mental illness and hatred are the triggers for gun violence, not the guns themselves. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that well-targeted gun control measures can play a significant role in reducing gun violence.

Garen Wintemute, Director of the Violence Prevention Research Program at UC Davis, has been a leading voice in this debate. Wintemute asserts that mental illness accounts for less than 5% of interpersonal violence, and that carefully conducted evaluation studies have shown that gun control policies are effective.

Research and policy reviews indicate that gun control measures such as background checks and red flag laws are generally effective in reducing gun violence and saving lives. According to multiple studies, laws restricting firearm access to people with domestic violence restraining orders are associated with reduced intimate partner homicides. Comprehensive implementation of multiple restrictive gun laws tends to correlate with decreases in gun-related deaths, suggesting that layered policies are more effective than any single law on its own.

Suicide rates tend to decline following gun control laws, a significant finding since firearms are a common and highly lethal means of suicide. A 2011 UN report concluded that greater firearm availability generally represents a risk factor for homicide rather than a protective factor, reinforcing the rationale for gun restrictions to reduce homicides.

However, it's important to note that some analyses argue that violent crime and murder rates have decreased in periods with looser gun regulations. This underscores the importance of considering multifaceted social and enforcement contexts.

Beyond laws, bystander intervention programs—training people who witness risky behavior involving firearms to speak up—show promise as a complementary approach to reduce gun violence. Research also shows that strict punitive approaches to youth gun possession can backfire, increasing reoffending, while educational and intervention programs can better reduce gun violence among young people.

International examples such as Australia’s response to mass shootings, involving rapid, broad gun reforms, have demonstrated significant reductions in gun violence after strict gun laws were enacted.

Governor Mike DeWine is urging gun control restrictions after public pressure, proposing to increase gun background checks and pass other measures. Gun control advocates view gun violence as a public health crisis.

Evaluation studies have shown that policies such as background checks and extreme risk protection orders, like the one proposed by Governor DeWine in Ohio, are effective in reducing gun violence. There is strong suggestive evidence that extreme risk protection orders are effective in preventing suicide.

The debate on gun control continues, with President Trump and Governor DeWine taking different approaches. While Trump focuses on mental health reform, DeWine is pushing for stricter gun legislation. The crowd in Dayton, where the recent mass shooting occurred, chanted, "Do something."

As the evidence mounts, it's clear that a comprehensive strategy that includes community engagement, prevention programs, and targeted gun control measures holds the most promise for reducing gun violence and saving lives.

[1] Wintemute, G. (2019). Firearm laws and gun violence. Journal of the American Medical Association.

[2] Webster, D. W., et al. (2016). Bystander intervention programs for gun violence prevention: A systematic review. American Journal of Public Health.

[3] Cook, P. J., et al. (2016). Firearms and violence: A critical review. Annual Review of Public Health.

[4] Humphreys, K., et al. (2015). The effects of police enforcement on youth homicide: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Chicago. Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[5] McCallum, J., et al. (2018). Australia's gun laws 25 years on: A study of the legal and illegal gun market. Australian Institute of Criminology.

  1. The government is urged to take action on gun control, particularly by implementing background checks and passing extreme risk protection orders, as evaluations show they can reduce gun violence.
  2. In the ongoing debate about gun control, political leaders, such as President Trump and Governor DeWine, advocate for different focuses: while Trump emphasizes mental health reform, DeWine pushes for stricter gun legislation.
  3. Research indicates that while looser gun regulations may show some decreases in crime rates, comprehensive strategies, including targeted gun control measures, community engagement, and prevention programs, are more effective in reducing gun violence.
  4. Moreover, the international community has demonstrated the effectiveness of stringent gun laws, as seen in Australia's significant reductions in gun violence after broad gun reforms.

Read also:

    Latest