Skip to content

Scholars Propose an intriguing theory as to why intellectually gifted individuals may benefit from decreased social interactions with peers.

Anticipating a social event, yet feeling a strange aversion, contemplating devising a reason to forgo the gathering.

Anticipating a social event yet feeling an unexpected urge to decline the invitation, instead of...
Anticipating a social event yet feeling an unexpected urge to decline the invitation, instead of experiencing joy.

Scholars Propose an intriguing theory as to why intellectually gifted individuals may benefit from decreased social interactions with peers.

In an unexpected twist, a recent study suggests that highly intelligent individuals might find less satisfaction in frequent social interactions compared to their peers. This insight, derived from research led by psychologists from Singapore Management University and the London School of Economics, challenges the conventional wisdom that spending time with friends boosts happiness.

The study, based on the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, revealed that people living in less crowded areas were generally happier, but this correlation did not hold true for highly intelligent individuals. These findings are in line with the Savanna Theory of Happiness, an evolutionary perspective that posits our brains are still wired to respond to the environmental conditions of our hunter-gatherer ancestors.

In these ancestral times, frequent social interaction and cooperation were essential for survival. However, highly intelligent individuals seem to have outgrown the need for constant connection that evolution ingrained in the rest of us. Their cognitive adaptability may explain their reduced reliance on social bonds for happiness.

While most people experience greater happiness with frequent social interactions, highly intelligent individuals reported the opposite. The more time they spent socializing, the less satisfied they felt. This paradox suggests that societal expectations and professional demands might compel them to engage in social activities, despite it not aligning with their preferences.

The study also found that highly intelligent individuals spent more time socializing than their less intelligent counterparts, highlighting a possible disconnect between theiractivities and their happiness levels. This raises questions about whether they are unaware of what truly makes them happy or if they lack control over their social habits.

Despite these insights, it's crucial to remember that happiness is deeply personal. Whether one thrives in solitude or finds joy in human connection, the key is to recognize what genuinely fulfills one's needs. The study underscores the importance of introspection in understanding one's happiness.

In conclusion, the Savanna Theory of Happiness provides a compelling framework for understanding how intelligence shapes our social preferences and well-being. It reminds us that there'sno one-size-fits-all approach to happiness, and the most important thing is to stay attuned to what brings us joy. So, the next time you find yourself choosing solitude over a social gathering, remember: it's not about whether you should socialize or not. It's about what truly makes you happy.

Highly intelligent individuals may find less satisfaction in frequent social interactions compared to their peers, aligning with the Savanna Theory of Happiness that proposes their cognitive adaptability reduces their reliance on social bonds for happiness. This theory also suggests that these individuals might prioritize health-and-wellness through increased solo activities over social gatherings, shedding light on the role of mental-health in their happiness.

Read also:

    Latest