Skip to content

Reform Misconceptions Regarding Medicaid, According to Larry Summers

Government policy implemented under the oversight of the ex-Treasury secretary was characterized as more ruthless.

Medicaid system reform's inaccuracies, as per Larry Summers' perspective
Medicaid system reform's inaccuracies, as per Larry Summers' perspective

Reform Misconceptions Regarding Medicaid, According to Larry Summers

In the year 2000, when Larry Summers served as Treasury Secretary under President Bill Clinton, discussions around budget and welfare reform included proposals to reduce the Medicaid program. However, it was during later administrations, such as George W. Bush's presidency, that specific major Medicaid reduction proposals gained more attention.

Fast forward to the present day, and the OBBB (One Big Beautiful Bill Act) is under scrutiny for its Medicaid cuts. The act, which has been criticised for adding trillions of dollars in debt, is also facing criticism for its approach to Medicaid.

According to the OBBB, the majority of the act's impact on Medicaid coverage will come from removing able-bodied adults who refuse to work from the program. This group, with a presumably low mortality risk, is the focus of the cuts.

The OBBB's Medicaid proposal aims to slow the rate of spending growth, but even after ten years, Medicaid spending under the act is expected to be more than $100 billion larger than it is today. In fact, Medicaid spending under the OBBB will be four times higher than it was when Summers was overseeing economic policy, and nearly twice as large relative to a much bigger economy.

The cuts to Medicaid and other programs offset only about a third of the cost of the rest of the bill, leaving many questioning the GOP's plan to address the current $2-trillion-a-year deficit and the increases that were already projected before the OBBB, or those that will result from it.

Larry Summers, in an article published in the New York Times, titled "This Law Made Me Ashamed of My Country", expressed his disapproval of the Medicaid cuts in the OBBB. He argues that the cuts "would probably result in more than 100,000 deaths".

It's important to note that the literature on mortality and Medicaid is conflicted. Some studies suggest that Medicaid recipients value the program at only about 20 to 40 cents per government dollar spent, while others, such as the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment, found no effects of Medicaid insurance on mortality.

Despite these conflicting findings, the high number of unaware Medicaid recipients (about 20 percent didn't even know they were enrolled) raises concerns about the potential impact of the cuts. Summers' assertion that the OBBB's Medicaid cuts could lead to a significant loss of life is a serious claim that warrants further investigation.

In conclusion, the Medicaid cuts in the OBBB have sparked controversy and raised concerns about their potential impact on the health and wellbeing of millions of Americans. As the debate continues, it's crucial to consider the facts and weigh the potential consequences of these cuts carefully.

Read also:

Latest