Potential Scenario for Air Emission Release Probability

Potential Scenario for Air Emission Release Probability

News Article: Establishing Observed Releases to the Air in the Hazard Ranking System

The Hazard Ranking System (HRS), a crucial tool in determining the potential hazards of a site, relies on several criteria to establish observed releases to the air. These criteria involve objective evidence of a release into the atmosphere, providing crucial data for the evaluation of a site's threat level and potential listing on the National Priorities List.

In the HRS process, initial investigations including limited field sampling and chemical data are used to assess if a site releases contaminants to the air pathway. The chemical analysis must demonstrate that a hazardous substance is present in air samples at concentrations exceeding background levels or regulatory thresholds, thereby confirming an actual release rather than just a potential or historical one.

Chemical analysis supporting the release of gaseous and particulate substances is essential. This evidence is used to calculate an HRS score, which evaluates the relative threat posed by the site. The analysis must adhere to valid analytical methods consistent with EPA standards, demonstrate concentrations that indicate release above normal environmental background, and provide documentation of release conditions, sampling methodology, and chain of custody.

The air pathway score considers factors like toxicity, quantity, and likelihood of exposure. The particulate potential to release value is calculated by summing the particulate source type factor value, particulate migration potential factor value, and multiplying this sum by the particulate containment factor value. The gas containment value is assigned from HRS Table 6-3, while the particulate containment value is assigned from HRS Table 6-9. The particulate migration potential factor values are assigned from HRS Figure 6-2, and different source type factor values may be assigned to any particular source for gaseous and particulate substances.

In situations where the site is not located on the map or is too near a boundary on the map, the Thornthwaite precipitation-effectiveness index is used to calculate the particulate migration potential factor value. This index is calculated using mean monthly precipitation and temperature data for the site.

It is worth noting that determining an air pathway score is straightforward, particularly as an adjunct to scoring the soil exposure pathway. However, it is rarely beneficial to score the air pathway in areas of low population density.

The overall potential to release value is the higher of the gas and particulate potential to release values. The particulate potential to release value is the highest product calculated for the sources evaluated and assigned as the particulate potential to release value for the site. This value, along with other factors, contributes to the overall hazard ranking of the site.

[1] EPA (2021). Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Rulemaking and Assessment Guidance. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/hazard-ranking-system-hrs-rulemaking-and-assessment-guidance

[2] EPA (2021). Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Fact Sheet. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/hazard-ranking-system-hrs-fact-sheet

[3] EPA (2021). Hazard Ranking System (HRS) Technical Guidance. [Online]. Available: https://www.epa.gov/superfund/hazard-ranking-system-hrs-technical-guidance

1. Surface water contamination at the site could potentially lead to health-and-wellness issues, as it might affect the drinking water supply, possibly causing medical-conditions due to the presence of hazardous substances.
2. In the environmental-science community, it has been suggested that air samples should be tested for waste particles, as their accumulation could adversely affect the land's ecosystem, impacting plant and animal life.
3. The Hazard Ranking System (HRS) not only assesses air releases but also considers the potential for a site to contaminate water resources, which has serious implications for both the environment and human health.
4. The Science Advisory Board, in its latest report, emphasized the need for improved air monitoring systems to accurately gauge contamination levels and their impact on air quality, affecting not only health-and-wellness but also the environment.
5. The mismanagement of waste disposal can lead to pollutants seeping into the groundwater, ultimately ending up in the surface water and even impacting the air we breathe, posing a risk to both our health and the environment.

Read also: